Why “Solid” or “Sturdy” Does Not Necessarily Make Gear Better

Why “Solid” or “Sturdy” Does Not Necessarily Make Gear Better


I grew up on a farm near the Canadian border routinely working 100 hours per week. Hard work required hard gear. At least that was my thought process all of those years ago. I grew to appreciate brands like Carhartt and Red Wing Shoes because they know how to make solid gear that lasts. I still have a Carhartt jacket from my early 20s and get nostalgic when I wear it or a pair of Red Wing boots. Anyone reading this article who has ever donned a Carhartt jacket or a pair of their bibs knows how long they take to break in and how long they last. They are not items that require frequent replacement.

Fast forward a decade or two, and I still have a hard time shaking the mentality that heavy is synonymous with quality. I am, or at least was, drawn to gear that can be described as solid, sturdy, or indestructible. These words are almost always synonymous with “heavy”. I mistakenly thought heavier items are better for no other reason than they last longer and I will not have to spend money on replacements as frequently. That logic led to my first suppressor being a full-auto rated stainless steel behemoth. It will last forever, but it was so heavy that off-handed shooting with it at the end of a 16” barrel was futile. It was even harder to handle when attached to the end of the 26” barrel of my Remington 700. I have since spent the extra money for a titanium suppressor from OSS (now HUXWRX) that is both durable and lightweight.

It has taken many years and more dollars than it should have, but I now recognize that there is a cost to weight. Qore Performance published a series of articles I wrote about the benefits of QPI’s hydrophobic plate carrier, the IcePlate EXO when compared to the SCARAB LT and the Crye Precision JPC 2.0. In those articles, I used math to show how even one ounce of weight translates to 132 pounds over the course of a mile (2,112 average steps per mile divided by 16 ounces per pound = 132 pounds). Carrying an extra pound of gear equates to over a ton of extra weight over a mile. Even if you are the hairiest of knuckle-draggers who prides himself on not complaining, why would you force yourself to lug around that kind of weight? (And if you’re a few pounds overweight, maybe the math will convince you that eating a few more salads and a little extra PT can be a huge advantage.)

I had the benefit of meeting with Justin Li, co-founder and CEO of Qore Performance, who let me handle an IcePlate EXO sample before they went to production. This was a light bulb moment for me - I finally realized that lightweight does not have to mean fragile. We did things with the EXO that I was certain would destroy it. But I was wrong. Qore Performance was able to fit the durability of Carhartt into a much lighter package. And when Qore Performance went to production with the EXO, I was one of the first people to fork over my money and know that I got everything I paid for.

Whether you are buying a new pair of running shoes or kit for the field, try to reconsider what it means for your gear to be “solid”.

Gunnar Anderson is a former EMT, rescue diver, and prosecutor who now trains and advises both law enforcement and emergency management.


Hinterlassen Sie einen Kommentar

Bitte beachten Sie, dass Kommentare vor der Veröffentlichung freigegeben werden müssen

Diese Website ist durch reCAPTCHA geschützt und es gelten die allgemeinen Geschäftsbedingungen und Datenschutzbestimmungen von Google.